BeyondIntractability.org   BeyondIntractability.org
Beyond Intractability: A Free Knowledge Base on More Constructive Approaches to Destructive Conflict
   

Empowerment


By
Máire A. Dugan


July 2003
 

PowerPoint  PowerPoint
Format
Shockwave/Flash  Shockwave/
Flash Format

One View of "Empowerment"

"Empowerment" has been a common topic among mainstream mediators in the United States since 1994, when Baruch Bush and Joseph Folger's The Promise of Mediation was published. They discuss empowerment in the context of what they call a transformative approach to mediation. Focusing on interpersonal conflicts, they distinguish between this approach and a narrower "problem-solving" approach. In a transformative approach, mediators do not focus exclusively on assisting parties to reach a mutually acceptable agreement. Rather:


"Power concedes nothing without demand." -- Frederick Douglass

"Washing one's hands of the conflict between the powerful and the powerless means to side with the powerful, not to be neutral." -- Paulo Freire

"I tell people to hell with charity, the only thing you'll get is what you're strong enough to get." -- Saul Alinsky

[T]ransformative mediators concentrate on empowering parties to define issues and decide settlement terms for themselves and on helping parties to better understand one another's perspective...[T]ransformative mediation helps parties recognize and exploit the opportunities for moral growth inherently presented by conflict. It aims at changing the parties themselves for the better, as human beings.[1]

By Bush and Folger's definition, "empowerment means the restoration to individuals of a sense of their own value and strength and their own capacity to handle life's problems."[2] In their treatment, empowerment does not include 'power balancing' or redistribution of power within the mediation process itself in order to protect weaker parties."[3] Further, it does not mean "controlling or influencing the mediation process so as to produce outcomes that redistribute resources or power outside the process from stronger to weaker parties."[4]

Bush and Folger identify two ways in which transformative mediators work to empower parties in a mediation:

  1. They adopt a "micro" focus. They presume that, during the mediation process, there will be many opportunities for each party to make decisions through which they will feel a new sense of control over the conflict, or at least over their behavior in the conflict. Transformative mediators listen carefully to the statements made by each party, looking for such transformative opportunities.

This approach contrasts with a "macro" focus, more common in the problem-solving approach, "in which mediators try to reach global assessments about the definition of the parties' problem and view all the parties' contributions in terms of inputs into this global problem-assessment effort."[5]

  1. Transformative mediators put a priority on encouraging and supporting parties in careful deliberation about the range of choices they may have available to them.

The parties' goals and choices are treated as central at all levels of decision making. Mediators consciously try to avoid shaping issues, proposals, or terms for settlement, or even pushing for the achievement of settlement at all. Instead, they encourage parties to define problems and find solutions for themselves, and they endorse and support the parties' own efforts to do so.[6]

The responsibilities of the transformative mediator do not include advocating, advising, or counseling in order to increase the strength of either party.

Although Bush and Folger's concept of empowerment and transformative mediation is useful, intractable conflicts call for a broader and deeper definition of empowerment. Often, it is not a question of "restoring" a sense of value and strength; oppressed and disenfranchised people may never have had this sense. Second, Bush and Folger focus on the interpersonal only. The interpersonal can be important in intractable conflicts, but it is never the only consideration. A more systemic consideration is needed. Finally, Bush and Folger limit their discussion to mediation, where we must here consider a broader array of intervention roles.

A Broader View of Empowerment

"Empowerment" has many meanings and uses, as reflected in these examples:

  • Wingspan Youth Development Services defines empowerment as character education and leadership development. The organization's theme is described by a quotation from Eleanor Roosevelt: "We must do that which we think we can not."[7]
  • The focus of African-American Community Empowerment, Inc. of Morris County, N.J., is reflected in its motto: "People helping people to attain personal growth through community empowerment."[8]
  • The Midlands Intertribal Empowerment Group defines its purpose as preserving and supporting Native American culture in South Carolina.
  • The Government of India has a Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment, and the city of Los Angeles, Calif., has a Department of Neighborhood Empowerment.
  • The Internet hosts a wide variety of self-improvement Web sites focused on personal empowerment.

Most of these definitions are more individual-oriented than is appropriate when focusing on intractable social conflict. In this essay, I use the word "empowerment" differently; here, "empowerment" refers to processes through which disenfranchised social groups work to change their social surroundings, change detrimental policies and structures, and work to fulfill their needs.

Interestingly, the word "empowerment" can be disempowering, when it is understood to mean the giving of power by the powerful to the powerless. That is not how the term is used here. The appropriate role of the person or group with power is to share, not to convey or impose. If I give or even lend you my power, you are beholden to me for it. If, on the other hand, I help you build your own power base, the power is yours, not mine. I may do this as a mentor, a researcher, a facilitator, or an ally, since leadership and spokesperson roles need to remain with the group that is in the process of empowering itself. The group must make and own its decisions, so that group members can develop and experience their own power.



Additional insights into empowerment are offered by Beyond Intractability project participants.

Empowerment Strategies

The strategies for empowering disenfranchised and oppressed people can be grouped into three general approaches: education, organization, and networking.

Education

The primer on education for empowerment is Paulo Freire's Pedagogy of the Oppressed. Its underlying tenet is that the disempowered already know a great deal about the sources of their oppression and what must be done to overcome it. What they do not have is an organized approach to translating this knowledge into action. The appropriate educational approach is therefore one that elicits participants' knowledge and responses. Freire calls this educational method "problem-posing."[9]

[T]he problem-posing educator constantly re-forms his reflections in the reflection of the students. The students--no longer docile listeners--are now critical co-investigators in dialogue with the teacher. The teacher presents the material to the students for their consideration, and re-considers her earlier considerations as the students express their own.[10]

Participants empower themselves by taking responsibility for their own learning (actively engaging as teachers as well as students), by increasing their understanding of the communities in which they live, and by understanding how they as individuals are affected by current and potential policies and structures. Equipped with this greater understanding and with new confidence in themselves, participants can develop policies and structures that better meet their needs, and strategies for bringing those policies into being.

Freire's approach is aligned with "transformative" learning theory, which has developed over the past 20 years:

Transformative learning involves participation in constructive discourse to use the experience of others to assess reasons justifying...[our] assumptions, and making an action decision based on the resulting insight...Transformation theory's focus is on how we learn to negotiate and act on our own purposes, values, feelings and meanings rather than on those we have uncritically assimilated from others--to gain greater control over our lives as socially responsible, clear-thinking decision makers.[11]

To bring about the deep change required to resolve intractable conflict, educators must be willing to challenge deeply held assumptions. It is important to assess not only the weaknesses of the other and the strengths of one's own group, but also the strengths of the other and one's own weaknesses. This assessment can be a wrenching process, for both the educator and the students.

Transformative learning, especially when it involves subjective reframing, is often an intensely threatening emotional experience in which we have to become aware of both the assumptions undergirding our ideas and those supporting our emotional responses to the need to change.[12]

Therefore, education that is intended to address inequities in the system should be not only interactive and dialogical (meaning involving a dialogue between "teacher(s) and student(s)), but also nurturing. The educational effort must also go beyond traditional education in its content and methods, to support learners in dealing with the emotional upheaval they are likely to experience.

Organization

As a community organizer, one of my first lessons was that poor people have no voice because they have no organization. An organization gives people a way of expressing their group needs in a way that cannot be ignored. This is the message that Saul Alinsky presented so powerfully in his books, and even more through the organizations he helped to establish, which are still active today.

While many groups come together around specific issues, and organize to confront those issues, Alinsky and others advocated a different approach: first, the building of an organization and, only then, focusing on specific issues.

"Building a strong, lasting and staffed organization alters the relations of power. Once such an organization exists, people on the "other side" must always consider the organization when making decisions."[13]

In Alinsky-style organizing, power is built up in a step-by-step approach, which includes both recruitment and achievement. Small groups are organized first, for example on a block-by-block or small neighborhood-by-small-neighborhood basis. Once the small groups have met and worked successfully together on issues, they are brought together into a larger community-wide organization. The larger group thus has an infrastructure as well as experience.

The groups begin with small, "winnable" issues. The newly organized group is rarely ready to take on City Hall--yet. Taking on a task too big is likely to be ineffective and lead to the demoralization of the group, encouraging a "See, I told you so" response, as members move back to resignation to intolerable or unjust conditions. The organizers must put a strong emphasis on helping the group choose "winnable issues" with which to begin.

Networking

Members of disenfranchised groups can realize and extend power through networking with others, both inside and outside their own social groups.

For example, Naomi Wolf describes the effectiveness of "power groups"[14] of women who meet each month (she prefers not to use the term "networking"). Although the group members may differ in a variety of ways, they often share a major interest such as religious affiliation or profession. The structure that Wolf identifies revolves around a gathering at which members share a meal and talk to each other informally. At a certain point in the meeting, each announces to the group what she is doing and what resources or contacts or information she has access to. She also tells the group what resources, contacts, or information she needs.[15]

Supplied with a list of names and phone numbers, "anyone can contact anyone else to make a request, propose a project, exchange information, or suggest a deal."[16] In Wolf's group, these contacts have resulted in a wide range of new ventures by the women involved, from obtaining new jobs or freelance work to putting on a benefit. Members are asked to share such news with the group, since this news "bolsters everyone's sense of effectiveness, and gives women practice in recounting their own triumphs and sharing in other women's triumphs."[17]

Another example of a group using structured networking as an empowerment tool is the Columbia Luncheon Club of Columbia, S.C., which has been holding monthly meetings for 40 years. When the American South was still segregated, the Club provided the only place for blacks and whites to gather socially in the state capital. There are now numerous such venues in Columbia, but the Club has been so successful that it continues. Harrison Reardon, Club President during 2002-2003, thinks that its impact can be attributed to its underlying precept: good will. The only requirement for club membership is a commitment to act with good will toward others, regardless of race, gender, or creed.

The Columbia Luncheon Club meetings are less structured than those of Wolf's power group. Members register for the monthly luncheon and are assigned to tables, ensuring that, over time, each member will have an opportunity to network with each other member. There is no agenda; table conversations typically begin with introductions that include the paid or volunteer work of the participants, and may build on this information or turn to recent events in the community. These conversations often lead to subsequent meetings between members who have noted some overlap in their interests.

As with Wolf's power groups, Columbia Luncheon Club members have "found jobs, apartments, and freelance work; traded services ... [and] sought investors."[18] Beyond this, the Luncheon Club has played a role in easing the community into a racially diverse sharing of political and economic power.

Empowerment and the Resolution of Intractable Conflicts

The above empowerment strategies can be used in efforts to resolve intractable conflicts. The essay on peacemaking processes presents a model, derived from the work of Adam Curle, that is helpful in determining how to use these strategies.

Educational efforts, in Curle's model, include strategies that increase awareness of the nature and sources of the conflict, and of ways of resolving the conflict that meet the needs of the initially less powerful groups. The discussion above provides guidelines for the type of education most likely to be both empowering and informative for disenfranchised groups.

It is also important to educate adversaries and potential allies. While many who benefit from the status quo will not be willing to give up their privilege in order to create a more equitable social system, some will be willing to do so if they fully understand their part in the system. As the costs of the conflict increase, other privileged individuals may reach a point at which they feel that the costs of privilege outweigh its benefits. Throughout the course of conflict, efforts should be made to educate these potential allies.

Organization also has a clear role in Curle's model. For educational efforts to reach a broad range of the population, organization is necessary. In addition, confrontational strategies (such as marches, strikes, or publicity campaigns) geared to overcome the existing imbalance among the parties are crucial. Without a well-organized campaign, small victories may be won, but the overall climate and structure are likely to withstand challenges if the campaign is not sufficiently organized to sustain itself for the long haul. Alinsky and others emphasized this need for ongoing, vital organizations that give voice to the needs and perspectives of the poor and disenfranchised.

The place of networking in Curle's model is less obvious, but nonetheless important. The change-oriented organization is likely to increase its effectiveness significantly through developing strong connections with a variety of other groups:

  • In the education phase, these connections can be useful in broadening the research and knowledge base of the campaign, as well as in incorporating new educational methods and resources.
  • During the confrontation stage, networking makes the inclusion of support groups and allies easier to arrange.
  • At the bargaining and conciliation stage, good networking makes trust building less problematic with both third parties and adversaries, since relationships already exist with both.

Finally, what is the appropriate role for those who intervene in empowerment efforts? Curle's model suggests that mediation may not be appropriate until power imbalances have first been addressed. Third parties can provide technical assistance, and can work as allies; Alinsky-style organizing offers a good model.

It is not appropriate for outsiders to take on leadership roles, since the result may actually be disempowering, as mentioned above. One of the key elements of this work is leadership development. While the organizer may be an "expert," her role requires her to stay in the background. In meeting with members prior to the initial group meeting, the organizer may help determine who might be most effective as a group leader. From the outset, small-group meetings are led by people from the community itself. The organizer then acts as a coach and de-briefer, rather than a leader.


[1] Robert A. Baruch Bush and Joseph P. Folger, The Promise of Mediation: Responding to Conflict Through Empowerment and Recognition (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1994), 12.

[2] Ibid, 2.

[3] Ibid, 95.

[4] Ibid, 96.

[5] Ibid, 100.

[6] Ibid, 101.

[7] Wingspan Youth Empowerment Services; available at http://www.wingspanyes.org/

[8] African-American community Empowerment Inc., (ACE) of Morris County; available at http://www.aceofmorris.org/

[9] Paulo Freire, Pedagogy of the Oppressed. (New York: Continuum, 2002).

[10] Ibid, 80-81.

[11] Jack Mezirow, "Learning to Think Like an Adult," in Learning as Transformation: Critical Perspectives in Theory in Progress, Jack Mezirow, ed. (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2000), 8.

[12] Ibid, 6-7.

[13] Kim Bobo, Jackie Kendall and Steve Max, Organizing for Social Change: Midwest Academy Manual for Activists. ( Santa Ana, CA: Seven Locks Press, 2001)

[14] Ibid

[15] Ibid, 298.

[16] Ibid

[17] Ibid, 299.

[18] Ibid, 300.


Use the following to cite this article:
Dugan, Máire A.. "Empowerment." Beyond Intractability. Eds. Guy Burgess and Heidi Burgess. Conflict Research Consortium, University of Colorado, Boulder. Posted: July 2003 <http://www.beyondintractability.org/essay/empowerment/>.

Sources of Additional, In-depth Information on this Topic

Additional Explanations of the Underlying Concepts:

Online (Web) Sources

Aithal, Vathsala. "Empowerment and Global Action of Women - Theory and Practice." , 1900
Available at:
http://www.skk.uit.no/WW99/papers/Aithal_Vathsala.pdf.

This essay discusses, at lenghth, the origins and diverse uses of the concept of empowerment, and it misuses. An emphasis is placed on the concept in relation to women's rights and feminism.

Fetterman, David. "Empowerment Evaluation in Theory." , 1900
Available at:
http://www.gse.harvard.edu/hfrp/eval/issue4/theory1.html.

A description of the theoretical underpinnings and overall approaches of empowering evaluation. The theory calls for a change in how social programs are evaluated from harsh criticism to ways that foster improvement and self-determination.

Black, Peter W. and Kevin Avruch. "Cultural Relativism, Conflict Resolution, Social Justice." , November 1999
Available at:
http://www.gmu.edu/academic/pcs/BlackAvruch61PCS.html.

Reflecting on Jim Laue's work raises an important question for cultural anthropologists: Is a culturally informed conflict resolution compatible with an ethically informed conflict resolution? Or does the specter of cultural relativism require that one or the other be dropped? In this essay the authors take up three of Laue's related concerns; prenegotiation, empowerment, and social justice, and discuss each in relation to cultural relativism. The authors attempt to show how, a methodological cultural relativism can enhance the first, an epistemological cultural relativism handicaps the second, and a normative cultural relativism, properly understood and deployed, need present no threat to the third.

Burgess, Heidi and Guy M. Burgess. "Advocacy Advisors and The Neutrality/Empowerment Problem." , 1900
Available at:
http://www.colorado.edu/conflict/peace/example/burg7466.htm.

One of the most difficult challenges facing the conflict resolution and peacemaking fields is the justice problem. This problem arises because the ultimate objective of our efforts is wise and just decision-making--not merely the resolution of conflicts for the sake of resolution. If the power distribution between contending parties is nearly equal, then conflict resolution processes are generally just. However, in cases where power is inequitably distributed, neutral intervention often simply sugar-coats the domination of one group by another, leading to an unjust result.

Burgess, Heidi and Guy M. Burgess. Transformative Mediation: What It Is.
Available at:
http://www.colorado.edu/conflict/transform/tmall.htm.
This page offers a detailed summary of the concept of transformative mediation as it is presented in Bush and Folger's book, The Promise of Mediation. The page discusses the two key concepts of recognition and empowerment, compares transformative to problem-solving mediation, and offers suggestions for finding a transformative mediator.

Hedeen, Timothy and Patrick G. Coy. "Community Mediation and the Court System: The Ties that Bind." , 1900
Available at:
http://www.mediate.com/articles/cohed2.cfm.

This article examines the pros and cons of affiliating community mediation programs with the justice system

Herrick, James. Empowerment Practice and Social Change: The Place for New Social Movement Theory.
Available at:
http://www.interweb-tech.com/nsmnet/docs/herrick.htm.
This paper critically examines current empowerment theory and its relationship to social change. It also sets forth ideas for social transformation via a new conception and practice of empowerment, drawing on new social movement theories.

Offline (Print) Sources

Weiner, Eugene, ed. Conflict Resolution Moves East: How the Emerging Democracies of Central and Eastern Europe Are Facing Interethnic Conflict . New York: Continuum Publishing, 1998.
The author draws on the work of Partners for Democratic Change in the emerging democracies of Eastern and Central Europe. Shonholtz explores the "intersection between the historical and cultural suppression of conflict and the democratic need for the expression and resolution of conflict."(p.360) Click here for more info.

Cobb, Sara. "Empowerment and Mediation: A Narrative Perspective." 9:3, July 1993.
The author investigates and critiques current concepts of empowerment, and current mediation practices designed to empower parties. She then suggests a narrative understanding of empowerment, and describes several mediation practices which follow from the narrative approach. Click here for more info.

Wolf, Naomi. Fire with Fire: The New Female Power and How It Will Change the 21st Century. New York: Random House, January 1, 1993.
This book advocates for women to see themselves in a new light. One that empowers them, not only to desire, but also to gain, power, equality, and economic security.

Mezirow, Jack. "Learning to Think Like an Adult." In Learning as Transformation: Critical Perspectives in Theory in Progress. Edited by Mezirow, Jack, ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, January 1, 2000.

Schwerin, Edward W. Mediation, Citizen Empowerment and Transformational Politics . Westport, Connecticut: Praeger, 1995.
The author argues that while empowerment is the core concept of transformational ideologies, it remains a fuzzy concept. Participation in community mediation is generally thought to be empowering, so he begins his analysis of empowerment by examining the community mediation movement. Click here for more info.

Bobo, Kim, Jackie Kendall and Steve Max. Organizing for Social Change: Midwest Academy Manual for Activists, 3rd Edition. Santa Ana, CA: Seven Locks Press, May 1, 2001.


Freire, Paolo. Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: Continuum, September 2000.
This work offers a general critique of education, arguing that the American model is not neutral as it claims to be. Instead, he argued that any curriculum that ignores issues of racism, sexism and the like actually serves to oppress and suport the status quo. Based on this premise, Freire argues that colletive action and power is the way toward social change and he lays out specific methods on how to achieve this. This is an updated edition of this classic book on its 20th anniversary.

Sharp, Gene. Power and Struggle: Politics of Nonviolent Action, Part I. Boston: Porter Sargent Pub., May 1974.
Part One of the Poltics of Nonviolent Action, Power and Struggle, explores the nature of power and the possibility of controlling or challenging power through nonviolent means. Click here for more info.

Bush, Robert A. Baruch and Joseph P. Folger. The Promise of Mediation: Responding to Conflict Through Empowerment and Recognition. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, September 1, 1994.
This book is the seminal work on the subject of transformative mediation. In exploring the transformative potential of mediation, the authors contrast their perspective on the practice of mediation with the more traditional problem-solving approach. They believe empowerment and recognition among participants, should be the primary goals of the mediation process. It is argued that these effects are more valuable in the long-term than the immediate settlement of a dispute. Click here for more info.

Return to Top


Examples Illustrating this Topic:

Online (Web) Sources

Canan, Penelope. When Are Nimby's the Desirable Result of Community Empowerment?.
Available at:
Click here for more info.
This paper is an edited transcript of a talk given by Penelope Canan for the Intractable Conflict/Constructive Confrontation Project on April 10, 1993. It contends NIMBYs (Not In My Back Yards), LULUs (Locally Unwanted Land Uses) and NOPEs (Not On the Planet Earths) are really citizen reactions to having been essentially left out of the initial decision-making calculus.

India's Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment.
Available at:
http://www.socialjustice.nic.in/.
The Ministry of Social Justice & Empowerment is entrusted with the welfare, social justice & empowerment of disadvantaged and marginalised section of the society viz, Scheduled Caste, Minorities, Backward Classes, Persons with Disabilities, Aged Persons, Street Children and victims of Drug Abuse etc. Basic objective of the policies, programmes, law and institution of the Indian welfare system is to bring the target groups into the main stream of development by making them self-reliant.

Los Angeles Department of Neighborhood Empowerment.
Available at:
http://www.lacity.org/done/.
The Mission of the Los Angeles Department of Neighborhood Empowerment is to promote public participation in government and make government more responsive to local needs by creating, nurturing, and supporting a citywide system of grass-roots, independent, and participatory neighborhood councils.

Midlands Intertribal Empowerment Group. Midlands Intertribal Empowerment Group.
Available at:
http://www.powwows.com/mieg/.
The purpose of the Midlands Intertribal Empowerment Group is to preserve and support Native American culture in South Carolina. To that end we encourage our membership to learn about Native American heritage, furnish assistance to Native American charitable interest, promote public education opportunities and awareness for Native American viewpoints, and provide primary organizational sponsorship for the annual Midlands Intertribal Powwow.

The Democratic Promise: Saul Alinsky and His Legacy.
Available at:
http://www.itvs.org/democraticpromise/index.html.
This page discusses the content of a documentary entitled, The Democratic Promise: Saul Alinsky and His Legacy. Alinky is renowned as the person who inspired the community organizing movement. The site describes Alinky's life and legacy, details the story presented in the documentary, and offers a good list of print and organizational resources.

Youth Empowerment Services.
Available at:
http://www.yescouncil.org/.
Wingspan's vision is to create a youth character development organization that will unite youth, parents, school systems and communities for the common goal of character development and youth leadership.

Offline (Print) Sources

Bush, Robert A. Baruch and Joseph P. Folger. "Capturing Opportunities for Empowerment and Recognition: A Case Analysis of Transformative Mediation in Practice." In The Promise of Mediation: Responding to Conflict Through Empowerment and Recognition. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, September 1, 1994. Pages: 139-188.
This chapter serves to illustrate the practice of transformative mediation by examining a particular landlord-tenant dispute. Specifically, the case captures the range of opportunities for empowerment that can arise in a mediation session. Click here for more info.

"Inviting Fortuitous Events in Mediation: The Role of Empowerment and Recognition." 13:4, 1996.
The author has come to realize that the sorts of "fortuitous events" that she seeks in her own mediation practice are just what Folger and Bush have described as transformative events. Click here for more info.

Return to Top


Audiovisual Materials on this Topic:

Offline (Print) Sources

Four Voices . Directed and/or Produced by: Yates, Pamela. First Run Icarus Films. 1988.
This film looks at the grass roots activities that are being done in an effort to improve four of America's poorest communities: the Assiniboine/Sioux Indian Reservation in Montana; the Black Belt area of Alabama; the Appalachian Mountain region of Tennessee; and the South Bronx section of New York. Click here for more info.

Nkulelko Means Freedom . Directed and/or Produced by: Hallis, Ron and Ophera Hallis. First Run Icarus Films. 1983.
This film shows how an educational system helped to empower the people of Zimbabwe and thus promote a democratic civil society. Click here for more info.

Return to Top


 
Get your facts first, and then you can distort them as much as you please. -- Mark Twain

Featured Links
Organizations Making Noteworthy Contributions to Efforts to Promote More Constructive Conflict
Sudan Information Gateway
Sudan Information Gateway


Other Resources from
Beyond Intractability
The Dynamics of Nonviolent Action
The Dynamics of Nonviolent Action

The Dynamics of Nonviolent Action will be of interest to those who seek a better understanding of the mechanism and operation of nonviolent resistance.

Nobel Peace Prize Winners

The 14th Dalai Lama, Tenzin Gyatso
The 14th Dalai Lama, Tenzin Gyatso

1989 Nobel Peace Prize Laureate

Beyond Intractability Version IV
Copyright © 2003-2007 The Beyond Intractability Project
Beyond Intractability is a Registered Trademark of the University of Colorado
Project Acknowledgements

The Beyond Intractability Knowledge Base Project
Guy Burgess and Heidi Burgess, Co-Directors and Editors
c/o Conflict Information Consortium (Formerly Conflict Research Consortium), University of Colorado
Campus Box 580, Boulder, CO 80309
Phone: (303) 492-1635; Fax: (303) 492-2154; Contact
University of Colorado at Boulder