Beyond Intractability: A Free Knowledge Base on More Constructive Approaches to Destructive Conflict
Abstract of "Deciding When To Go" by Michael O'Hanlon and Stephen Solarz
Citation: O'Hanlon, Michael and Stephen Solarz. "Deciding When To Go." The Washington Post, Outlook, 7 Feb 1999. Available from: The Brookings Institution, http://www.brookings.edu/views/op-ed/OHanlon/19990207.htm.
This Abstract written by: Conflict Consortium Staff
Michael O'Hanlon and Stephen Solarz explore the inconsistent patterns of the US military intervention in conflicts across the globe. While the US cannot intervene everywhere, the government must strategically choose conflict areas where it is safe to get involved. Intervention, according to the authors, should not: jeopardize more lives than humanitarian intervention could have saved, risk an additional war within the country or with adjacent countries, involve a large number of troops, or be difficult to develop a proper exit strategy. The authors also stress that the US should not get involved with a country with the primary purpose of nation building. With proper intervention strategies, "the United States and the international community may be able to significantly reduce the level of bloodshed around the world," without compromising the safety of other citizens.
Other Resources from Beyond Intractability Development and Conflict Theory "Development should be understood as a process, not a product. Societies are always changing. Some improve, while others fail. Development theory aims at explaining both processes."
Nobel Peace Prize Winners
Lech Walesa Trade union leader, and 1983 Nobel Peace Laureate
The Beyond Intractability Knowledge Base Project Guy Burgess and Heidi Burgess, Co-Directors and Editors c/o Conflict Information Consortium(Formerly Conflict Research Consortium), University of Colorado Campus Box 580, Boulder, CO 80309 Phone: (303) 492-1635; Fax: (303) 492-2154; Contact